Elizabeth Matheson PAKA Pottery base markings on Pinterest

This is so interesting already.  Yikes !!!!
When time permits I will add more, but check out how many different letters and dots there are already !!
Also there is a light blue LCC and a deep red LCC which was rather surprising.
These are just from our site plus the listing that Jeremy added a link to.

[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

Excellent Ev!

Listing the base markings in year order:
It is quite ridiculous to think that these letters represent people who worked with Elizabeth to my way of thinking.

1937 KG3
1939 NK?
1941 BG +3 dots
1942 BG
1949 APB +3 dots
1954 EB + 3 dots
1960 CT +3 dots
1960 PC + 3 dots
1960 LG2 + 4 dots
1961 LG2 + 6 dots
1963 LCC + 8 dots
1964 LCC + 3 dots
1966 LCC + 4 Dots

63 LCC 8 dots

[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

I see you have put it on Pinterest Ev but you haven't recorded the dots above.

Thanks Jeremy.
I have a piece of her work, it doesn't have a date and the markings are either C over 11 or C with the Pi symbol, so I won't add that one as it is too mysterious.

Here's the mug I didn't buy on trademe.
I forget the seller. Disappeared now.
The montage is my own.

66 LCC 4 dots pale blue glaze
[You must be registered and logged in to see this image.]

[You must be registered and logged in to see this image.]
sugar bowl, 95mm OD, and milk jug, 95mm H
[You must be registered and logged in to see this image.]
63 left (LCC ..) and 68 I think right (LCC ... with the dots forming a triangle)
.

Another auction with controversy over the Elizabeth Matheson base marks.
This will never go away as the Potters Mark book entry saying that BG is Briar Gardner's mark will be there forever!!

[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

[You must be registered and logged in to see this image.]
I thought I would add this, as there doesn't appear to have been another piece with CN as the marking. How can you tell what year this was made please Ev?
[You must be registered and logged in to see this image.]

Thank you!
The year is under PAKA.
Is it 61 ? If so then it was made in 1961.

Oh yes, I see it now, thank you!