Latest topics
Vit Saucers 4624 and 4634 (and Forma saucer)
2 posters
Page 1 of 1
Vit Saucers 4624 and 4634 (and Forma saucer)
Ev, this is the stacking hotel saucer, yet to take its place in the gallery.
Last edited by Jeremy Ashford on Fri 15 Aug - 15:10; edited 3 times in total
Jeremy Ashford- Number of posts : 3193
Location : Whangarei, New Zealand
Registration date : 2010-09-11
Re: Vit Saucers 4624 and 4634 (and Forma saucer)
Thanks Jeremy, I've been meaning to take a pic of one of mine. It has a similar look to a Forma saucer right?
Re: Vit Saucers 4624 and 4634 (and Forma saucer)
It's similar in that they both have the upturned edge, but this is more shapely in the middle as one footring sits within the well and one outside it, locking it in place.
Last edited by Jeremy Ashford on Tue 10 Jun - 16:07; edited 1 time in total
Jeremy Ashford- Number of posts : 3193
Location : Whangarei, New Zealand
Registration date : 2010-09-11
4634
Ev, I'm adding the 4634 4D demi-saucer too.
This is effectively the same shape as the Tango 734 in the gallery but the dates are correct for the numbers:
The Tango is 1966.
4634 was introduced 1968.
This RNZAF is 1971.
I know the gallery pics are small so a picture of front and back of saucers is out of the question, but I'm wondering about the wisdom of adding "replies" to the individual gallery number pages. I've found that in identifying saucers much of the info is on the back, not just the date but footring size and type.
For the vit demi-saucer I have identified two completely different shapes (by way of an upgrade) that do not coincide with the change from 3D to 4D number.
This is effectively the same shape as the Tango 734 in the gallery but the dates are correct for the numbers:
The Tango is 1966.
4634 was introduced 1968.
This RNZAF is 1971.
I know the gallery pics are small so a picture of front and back of saucers is out of the question, but I'm wondering about the wisdom of adding "replies" to the individual gallery number pages. I've found that in identifying saucers much of the info is on the back, not just the date but footring size and type.
For the vit demi-saucer I have identified two completely different shapes (by way of an upgrade) that do not coincide with the change from 3D to 4D number.
Last edited by Jeremy Ashford on Fri 15 Aug - 15:09; edited 1 time in total
Jeremy Ashford- Number of posts : 3193
Location : Whangarei, New Zealand
Registration date : 2010-09-11
Re: Vit Saucers 4624 and 4634 (and Forma saucer)
Thanks .....
I suggest that you put a link to the topic in the quick reply box.
We use that to find original posts all of the time.
I suggest that you put a link to the topic in the quick reply box.
We use that to find original posts all of the time.
4624 and Forma
Sometime things are not spelled out that maybe some think obvious and others miss entirely.
It is not unusual for earthenware saucers to have vitrified counterparts, sometimes produced from the same model, but varying as the nature of the manufacturing process determines.
The original demitasse saucers, EW vs vit, were effectively the same shape.
So too the coupe saucers for EW and vit tulips.
The Forma saucer is effectively the same shape as the hotel stacking saucer (4624). The stacking saucer is smaller (as is usually the case wrt EW), has a rolled edge, and a slightly better defined integral foot ring, but otherwise their profiles are the same.
Both were designed with a cupwell to seat a double-footring cup which gives added stability.
I would have mentioned this earlier, had I possessed a Forma saucer, but that didn't happen until this week.
It is not unusual for earthenware saucers to have vitrified counterparts, sometimes produced from the same model, but varying as the nature of the manufacturing process determines.
The original demitasse saucers, EW vs vit, were effectively the same shape.
So too the coupe saucers for EW and vit tulips.
The Forma saucer is effectively the same shape as the hotel stacking saucer (4624). The stacking saucer is smaller (as is usually the case wrt EW), has a rolled edge, and a slightly better defined integral foot ring, but otherwise their profiles are the same.
Both were designed with a cupwell to seat a double-footring cup which gives added stability.
I would have mentioned this earlier, had I possessed a Forma saucer, but that didn't happen until this week.
Jeremy Ashford- Number of posts : 3193
Location : Whangarei, New Zealand
Registration date : 2010-09-11
Page 1 of 1
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
Yesterday at 19:42 by Ev
» Steenstra Vase with decals
Tue 19 Nov - 6:37 by Ev
» Steenstra Brick Clay Vase being used for the first time!
Mon 18 Nov - 15:24 by Ev
» Kermiko Vase in pastel green
Mon 18 Nov - 8:16 by Ev
» Temuka hand painted fun bowl.
Mon 18 Nov - 7:09 by Ev
» Carrick Oliver coffee pot
Sun 17 Nov - 17:48 by JanPots
» Is this a Dorothy Thorpe cream jug? No mark stamped
Sun 17 Nov - 12:29 by Lee333
» Name this plate please. It's Riverside.
Sun 17 Nov - 6:17 by Ev
» Titian Studio Presley Ware V117 stunning lustre glaze
Thu 7 Nov - 16:02 by kitsch