Latest topics
Galaxy Pat.No.112 Kelston Ceramics
2 posters
Page 1 of 1
Galaxy Pat.No.112 Kelston Ceramics
Photo and words courtesy of Jonno.
Here is the first of my collection that differs from your listings and photos.
![Galaxy Pat.No.112 Kelston Ceramics Galaxy10](https://i.servimg.com/u/f49/12/53/23/96/galaxy10.jpg)
The backstamp on the above states:-
GALAXY
pat. no 122
KELSTON
POTTERIES
NEW ZEALAND
In variance with your pic on page 4 which says d749 for a completely different design in a brown tone.
So dear old CL used the same name for two completely different designs. I suspect that the use of different pottery names could have caused this sort of duplication, I have seen other examples.
Here is the first of my collection that differs from your listings and photos.
![Galaxy Pat.No.112 Kelston Ceramics Galaxy10](https://i.servimg.com/u/f49/12/53/23/96/galaxy10.jpg)
The backstamp on the above states:-
GALAXY
pat. no 122
KELSTON
POTTERIES
NEW ZEALAND
In variance with your pic on page 4 which says d749 for a completely different design in a brown tone.
So dear old CL used the same name for two completely different designs. I suspect that the use of different pottery names could have caused this sort of duplication, I have seen other examples.
Last edited by Ev on Sat 15 Aug - 16:27; edited 1 time in total
Re: Galaxy Pat.No.112 Kelston Ceramics
Many thanks Jonno - I will add your photo to the Gallery ![Smile](https://2img.net/i/fa/i/smiles/icon_smile.gif)
My personal Crown Lynn Database shows 4 listings for Galaxy:
d162
d749
pat.no.112 - 36 piece exclusive
J10
I saw a Galaxy pattern the other day, but as it didn't have a pattern number I didn't want to pay $10 for the vitrified entree plate. It had goldy half scrolls around the edge .... I will know it if I see it again.
My thoughts are that if they used different brand names they could reuse the pattern names.....?
![Smile](https://2img.net/i/fa/i/smiles/icon_smile.gif)
My personal Crown Lynn Database shows 4 listings for Galaxy:
d162
d749
pat.no.112 - 36 piece exclusive
J10
I saw a Galaxy pattern the other day, but as it didn't have a pattern number I didn't want to pay $10 for the vitrified entree plate. It had goldy half scrolls around the edge .... I will know it if I see it again.
My thoughts are that if they used different brand names they could reuse the pattern names.....?
Re: Galaxy Pat.No.112 Kelston Ceramics
Very interesting Ev or did they think that because it is Galaxy they could have as many variations as there are constellations in the Galaxy?
![Laughing](https://2img.net/i/fa/i/smiles/icon_lol.gif)
Jonno- Number of posts : 662
Location : Milford,Auckland
Registration date : 2011-05-13
Page 1 of 1
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
» Christopher Peter Clouston
» Another mystery mark. Pottery ID
» Shape 17 being used at last !!
» Heritage in Blue
» Kelston Potteries No Name Pink Rose
» Lynndale Ware Backstamp
» Who made this platter? Does anyone know
» Is this a stork or a crane perhaps?